I was reading the book, Cat’s Cradle, by Kurt Vonnegut when I had an interesting series of thoughts. The specific part I was reading at the time discussed the indexing of a book. One character was a professional indexer. This skill also enabled her to look at any index and draw specific conclusions about the book’s author. From a book discussing the history and people of a particular country, she said the index revealed that the author was homosexual. I was surprised.
For some reason this made me think about the Bible. I’ve had several in depth conversation with friends about the Bible, including thoughts on inerrancy, validity, relevancy and it’s authors. This made me think about Paul – who is the author of a majority of the New Testament books. I’ve always thought very highly of Paul. I know he certainly wasn’t perfect, due to his history of persecuting followers of Jesus, but I think in my mind I thought of him as practically perfect after his Damascus road conversion. I had a new personal thought that maybe Paul struggled with homosexual desires. I was surprised again.
This comes after having more in depth conversation with friends about life and struggles and relationships - openness, honesty and meaning. One friend told me that several years ago, during a serious relationship breakup, she felt able to be open and totally honest only with one other friend while working through the heartache and confusion. The thing about that confidant friend of hers is that she was not a Christian. My friend did not feel like there was a Christian who she could talk to at the time. While she was telling me this story, I mentally noted that she and I were friends back then and I must certainly have fallen into that group of Christians she couldn’t be completely honest with about herself without feeling judged. I was disappointed, but I wasn’t that surprised.
I know that Paul was not a homosexual. I am using that word now as the lifestyle defining, general blanket of a thing that many Americans, particularly professed Christians, use to summarize the entirety of a person who happens to act freely on physical desires for the same sex. Paul was not a lifestyle homosexual (and most likely he probably didn’t have an occasional experience in that category either). I know this because it would negate his writing. This wouldn’t surprise anyone.
Interesting discussion has always surrounded Paul’s unknown “thorn in the flesh.” Many people make speculations about the identity of this thorn. The consensus seems to be a physical affliction or the persecution struggle he went through as a Jesus follower. I think that’s about right. Turns out others, starting with some medieval era folks, thought Paul’s thorn was a struggle with fleshly lusts. Those crazy fleshly lusts were evidently a major struggle for many people living in medieval times. I knew my idea was not original, about Paul, but it was interesting to learn who thought it up. Again, not surprised
So going back to all those deep conversations: what’s wrong with Christians in America, is the Bible completely true, what is sin and what isn’t, what about war, what does religion mean, why is Jesus more than religion, what to do about prejudice and intolerance, what about homosexuality, combating all encompassing terms like prejudice, intolerance and homosexuality, where do politics and Jesus meet, life purpose and me 101, etc. With my new thought about Paul, and taking into account all those conversations, I decided it would be good for America if we read Paul’s letters believing that he struggled with homosexual tendencies – like he was a “Christian homosexual”. I think we would all be surprised.
But then I had another thought, again, not new to the world. Maybe it wasn’t about Paul. Maybe it is my idea about Paul and the perfection pedestal I put him on. I am not perfect and I cannot relate. I know that Peter and pretty much all the disciples was a very wayward dysfunctional bunch of sin-tendencied men that struggled even with Jesus standing right next to them. I am just like them and I can relate. Since that big chunk of New Testament is Paul’s writing, and the church typically preaches and acts from that text, and the typical conservative American Christian often times falls into legalism and defensiveness, then I think what America has produced is a distorted Paul as Jesus theology. I don’t understand Jesus, but that’s because I cannot fathom God, and who assumes that they can? He talks in parables, he doesn’t follow the rules, he was treated unfairly and killed, he loves everybody the same. All that makes me like him more, and because of who he hung out with and the impact he had on social “injustices” makes him sort of a hippie, and its cool to be a reformed hippie right now. I understand Paul, as Superman, and that’s because we are told we are supposed to be Superman – it is the American dream (what global citizen wouldn’t want that?). Paul was a religious guy, to the point of going overboard. He has a run-in with Jesus, got that last crucial duck in the row and off he went. He survived shipwrecks and beatings and wrote things down and offended a lot of people with holy intolerance. Sure what he says is actually founded on the ultimate Jesus truths of love and grace, but its hard to put Jesus and Paul side by side and believe in both as right, so it is easier to look at only one side. I think that is what Americans believe deep down – we pick sides. The Christians pick Paul and everyone else picks Jesus. Is that a surprise?
I cannot read Paul’s writings supposing that he was dealing with homosexuality because that is how I should have been reading it all along, as myself. As a human, just like Paul, I have all sorts of tendencies and imperfections, whatever form they may take for either of us. Unlike Jesus, Paul and I actually act out on those tendencies, living up to that sin nature we were born with. I need to approach the Bible, my life, and other people in a real way, being myself. The Biblical authors can’t judge me nor I them. I can’t judge my friends nor they judge me. We all struggle, we all screw up, we are all loved totally and completely. Jesus still changes everyone the same way. Living that should make all the difference. Why is this old idea always a new surprise?